US testing the concept of single pilot C130 and KC46 assisted by a lone loady
Thread Starter
US testing the concept of single pilot C130 and KC46 assisted by a lone loady
They are doing trials in the sims to see if feasibly if ever needed
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...d-by-air-force
The U.S. Air Mobility Command is expanding the limited-aircrew employment concepts it has been exploring with aircraft like the KC-46 Pegasus to include the C-130J Super Hercules. The initial plan is to get select C-130J pilots and loadmasters trained on exactly how a flight utilizing only one of each would be executed, which will include the loadmaster helping the pilot fly the aircraft. All of this is part of an effort to prepare Mobility Air Forces for emergency scenarios where a threat or series of factors would require reduced crew operations.
Undergoing training on what has been dubbed the ‘one pilot-one loadmaster’ concept for C-130Js has been aircrew from the 19th Airlift Wing’s 61st and 41st Airlift Squadrons based out of Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas. These exercises will be held on the ground in a flight simulator at first, with the goal of eventually getting all pilots and loadmasters within the units trained on the concept in this environment.
Undergoing training on what has been dubbed the ‘one pilot-one loadmaster’ concept for C-130Js has been aircrew from the 19th Airlift Wing’s 61st and 41st Airlift Squadrons based out of Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas. These exercises will be held on the ground in a flight simulator at first, with the goal of eventually getting all pilots and loadmasters within the units trained on the concept in this environment.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...d-by-air-force
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
As a QFI on the C130J I would frequently fly the sim by myself when preparing scenarios for teaching crews, it was no big deal when everything was working ok. The problems start when you’re dealing with complex emergencies or indeed if the sole pilot needs to visit the toilet. The ALM would as a minimum need to be able to do the R/T, input a change of course into the CNI-MU, deal with an inflight emergency and all whilst making the pilot a cup of tea…!!
Having done pilot incapacitation sims where the ALM sat in the co’s seat after the former was ‘killed’ even very experienced ALMs could be a drain on my capacity as they weren’t really trained for the task. I always felt that they were more useful in the middle seat where they were more comfortable. If they were going to sub for a lone pilot they would need a considerable amount of extra training in which case you might as well use a pilot. Sitting in the RHS is also where young co-pilots learn their trade prior to becoming captains.
I once had to start up an ac as the spare frame for a v important formation sortie, with the ALM outside on the long lead it felt very lonely on the ac all by myself…
Having done pilot incapacitation sims where the ALM sat in the co’s seat after the former was ‘killed’ even very experienced ALMs could be a drain on my capacity as they weren’t really trained for the task. I always felt that they were more useful in the middle seat where they were more comfortable. If they were going to sub for a lone pilot they would need a considerable amount of extra training in which case you might as well use a pilot. Sitting in the RHS is also where young co-pilots learn their trade prior to becoming captains.
I once had to start up an ac as the spare frame for a v important formation sortie, with the ALM outside on the long lead it felt very lonely on the ac all by myself…
The following users liked this post:
I'm guessing you didn't read/register this bit .....
for emergency scenarios where a threat or series of factors would require reduced crew operations.
If a ground crew "Chiefy" can fly an H model half way across the atlantic on his own (including take of ......) .. a suitably trained loady will be substantially more capable .....
for emergency scenarios where a threat or series of factors would require reduced crew operations.
If a ground crew "Chiefy" can fly an H model half way across the atlantic on his own (including take of ......) .. a suitably trained loady will be substantially more capable .....
Originally Posted by ExAscoteer2
Yeah that'll work well. NOT!
During the course of my flying career, both military and civilian, I saw the demise of many aircrew trades. My flight deck crews, other than we two pilots, started out with a navigator, signaller, and flight engineer. Eventually there was only the two of us left, but mercifully our cabin crews remained. Of all those departed specialisations, the ones I missed the most were the flight engineers. As KS says above, no problem when everything worked, but a godsend, both in the air and on night stops down route; to analyse faults, perform in flight workarounds, and organise possible rectification on the ground. Worth their weight in gold!
Apologies to the others for any hurt feelings. I missed you too!
Apologies to the others for any hurt feelings. I missed you too!
When either of the two pilots drops dead mid-air, or becomes incapacitated , (on a two pilot aircraft)....what happens?
Do we actually need this new program and expenditure of funds or could we just do a review of Incident Reports to determine the outcomes of all of those?
Do we actually need this new program and expenditure of funds or could we just do a review of Incident Reports to determine the outcomes of all of those?
The following users liked this post:
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I recon somebody is forgetting something....the human tendancy to screw things up now and again!! Another more darker part of me is thinking that there is lots of signals in recent months that somebody somewhere is expecting a very big confrontation in the next few years.
Of all those departed specialisations, the ones I missed the most were the flight engineers.
The following users liked this post:
Originally Posted by Herod
I recall, back in the dim past of the Wessex, some of the loadies could fly the thing better than a lot of the pilots.
When we ran short of pilots over the Water we would fly with 2 Crewman and 1 Pilot. The Left Hand Seat crewman were all checked out by QHI's and written up as SQAMs (Suitably Qualified Aircrew Members). Our duties normally consisted of the Navigation, Radios etc but we were capable of taking control in the event of pilot incapacity for whatever reason. Most would get hands on when away on task to spell him on transits etc.
The following 2 users liked this post by charliegolf:
The following users liked this post:
Some of the comments here reveal the stark differences in philosophy and training between transport fleets and rotary fleets; it seems that pilots that come third out of three at streaming seem to consider themselves the most irreplaceable?
The following 3 users liked this post by minigundiplomat:
There's a commissioned Loady who went one better - on a STANEVAL trip, he briefed the sortie, was put in the RHS from where he flew/operated the entire task and handled simulated a/c emergencies. He was awarded a D Cat - as a pilot; RAF was then obliged to give him the full formal wings course. I made my one-and-only visit to Cranditz for the Flying Supe course while he was there; his QFIs were bitching and moaning that he was guaranteed an OCU slot at the end of course, we pointed out that he already had more operational experience than most of them (creamies and ex-AT seat-fillers) and was already a proven asset. He went on to thrive in the civvy flying world, top bloke.
The following users liked this post:
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
Some of the comments here reveal the stark differences in philosophy and training between transport fleets and rotary fleets; it seems that pilots that come third out of three at streaming seem to consider themselves the most irreplaceable?
CG
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Some of the comments here reveal the stark differences in philosophy and training between transport fleets and rotary fleets; it seems that pilots that come third out of three at streaming seem to consider themselves the most irreplaceable?
Many ME pilots came from more esteemed backgrounds, such as FJ pilots with medical issues (lost bang seat cat for example) or in my own case I was re-streamed from FJ and chose comfy beds over sleeping bags, I don’t believe that put me at the back of a metaphorical queue behind those sky-gods streamed straight from BFT.
I suspect the issue is more that handling a large complex aircraft with multiple engines and systems as well as potentially a large number of pax is seen by those who have flown them as more in need of a bigger crew than a simpler type, even if the latter might be a bit trickier to actually handle.
