Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Disgusting Jetstar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 00:17
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Take the taser thing up with AFP. Not our issue what they do. They can conduct investigations if they need be.

You don’t follow crew instructions repeatedly, and after many minutes. You are off. I really don’t care how the AFP drag you off, if you don’t simply get up and walk off with them, then they will use whatever means, they know our decision up front is final and have no choice.

The issue I have is around following instructions. Don’t get too sidetracked with all the other stuff happening on the side. Jetstar’s ground operations and systems are another matter. An investigation into how the event even came about might be warranted, but at the end of the day, instructions didn’t get followed by the crew. Your off.

Last edited by PoppaJo; 22nd Mar 2023 at 00:29.
PoppaJo is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by PoppaJo:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 00:21
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 608
Received 67 Likes on 27 Posts
Plenty of people making grandiose pronouncements about what should’ve happened, without really knowing exactly what did happen. Occasionally the aggrieved passenger’s account isn’t necessarily the whole story…
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 00:41
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oz
Posts: 306
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wingnut, you missed this bit of my statement- "Obviously there are safety margins which make it safe". It's a bit like if you're carrying a Samoan Rugby team v's a bunch of average Indonesians. Vastly different weights. If the company policy is no seat changes then that's the rule.
I think it's safe to say that we know "weight and balance" is just a crap excuse cabin crew are taught to say in ground school and it works 99% of the time.



clark y is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 00:54
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
  1. It appears very simple to me. If you want to sit together pay the money and buy tickets/seats next to each other.
  2. follow crew instructions
  3. If you choose not to follow instructions expect consequences.
“bye , thanks for coming”

Last edited by RENURPP; 22nd Mar 2023 at 04:17.
RENURPP is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by RENURPP:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 00:57
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,926
Received 391 Likes on 206 Posts
Sorry but you are all missing the point, the MOMENT a passenger refuses to obey a Cabin Crew instruction they have committed an offence. Now I realise we live in a world where individuals feel they are too ‘special’ to have pesky rules apply to them but it is against the law regardless. He was asked to move, he wouldn’t, he even admits he requested the police presence. Cabin Crew did NOT instruct the cops to use the taser, this idiot obviously wound the police up to the point they felt this was an appropriate use of force. If you side with the passenger then what next, allow people to vape? Sit with no belt on?……. Why should the crew spend time ‘facilitating the move’, there is a reason the terms and conditions say if you want to be seated together then you have to pay the $5 for assigned seating. He ticked that box and then thought he would be cleaver and arrange the reseating himself.
Difficult to know what to make of it all without knowing what directives/rules the CC operate under regarding seat swaps. Boarded a aircraft in Doha and on fishing in the seat pocket for the briefing card found my hand swimming in someones vomit, stench appalling, seating was found elsewhere for the three of we family which had us scattered all over the aircraft. Boarded in LAX for a trans Pacific on United and was asked if I'd mind swapping seats so two folk could sit with each other. Don't know if they still do it but boarding a DC-9 in Hawaii it was a free for all, no assigned seating. Boarded a QF at Tulla for a trans Pacific and name didn't appear on the manifest, told to "just sit over there". Stuff happens.

Disgusting Jetstar? No, disgusting opening post though.

Last edited by megan; 22nd Mar 2023 at 01:12.
megan is online now  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 01:22
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,216
Received 117 Likes on 61 Posts
Originally Posted by VHOED191006
Yea, 3 hours apart from your family ain't going to be the end of it all. Get up, listen to the crew, sit where you are directed to. There is always a reason why they're asking you to move (even if you've done nothing wrong).
Riiighhhhtt....

Like that FA who asked a bloke to move because....he was a bloke. Yesirreeee, you can be asked to move seats simply because you are a male.
KRviator is online now  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 01:48
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 29
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Multi culture to blame?

Originally Posted by MagnumPI
It never ceases to amaze me that there are so many pilots and flight crew out there who could (and perhaps have!) successfully manage an emergency in-flight, but apparently can't negotiate or de-escalate a difficult situation with a fellow human being. It indicates a concerning lack of empathy. As an aside - CASA seems to be obsessed with preventing autistic people getting a medical certificate, yet I've met many pilots who I'm nearly certain were somewhere on the spectrum judging by their inability to empathise and read social cues.

If you think that someone being tasered is an appropriate way to resolve a dispute over where someone is seated you should seek help. Obviously it's the AFP that have done the tasering, but the fact that the crew were unable to negotiate with a man that was reportedly not being aggressive or violent says a lot about how little emphasis is placed on customer service training and dispute resolution at Jetstar.

I wonder if the Captain or FO went down to have a reasonable discussion with him and to listen to his concerns? Not mentioned in the article.
RtpicaL

Lets be honest here, a lot of the pilots I have worked with want as little to do with the passengers as possible.

I have experienced a growing culture of disregard and lack of empathy in aviation and other industries. Time is money now and that is all that matters in Australia 2023.

This culture combines with the government media driven cultures of fear, the new follow orders from the " officials" or else culture and the new import from the usa: if you complain you are an ist / orange man bad person etc etc etc.

I enjoyed working with passengers mostly and had patience with them and from what passengers told me it was a rare thing.
Could this be a factor in this increasing trend of air rage / airport rage and all the other increasing rage?

Discuss....
doublemamba is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 01:57
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Aus
Posts: 172
Received 39 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by doublemamba
RtpicaL

Lets be honest here, a lot of the pilots I have worked with want as little to do with the passengers as possible.

I have experienced a growing culture of disregard and lack of empathy in aviation and other industries. Time is money now and that is all that matters in Australia 2023.

This culture combines with the government media driven cultures of fear, the new follow orders from the " officials" or else culture and the new import from the usa: if you complain you are an ist / orange man bad person etc etc etc.

I enjoyed working with passengers mostly and had patience with them and from what passengers told me it was a rare thing.
Could this be a factor in this increasing trend of air rage / airport rage and all the other increasing rage?

Discuss....
You're probably right.

My theory is that people are far less comfortable having difficult conversations and resolving disputes. Anecdotally, I see this all the time in business with people trying to negotiate or resolve disputes over text or email instead of picking up the phone or meeting face to face. Pre-internet you use to complain about a business by writing or calling to speak with someone who (hopefully) cared. These days most people just let loose on a keyboard, and will say things that they'd never otherwise say to a human being!

Many pilots may not be particularly charismatic (and perhaps that suits their occupation just fine most of the time) - but you should still be able to hold a discussion with a passenger.

Nothing reported on yet about whether or not the CA or FO tried to speak with the passenger before the authorities arrived with a freshly charged taser. I hope one of them tried.
MagnumPI is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 02:06
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
This bloke did the wrong thing and he got arrested. No one is contesting that.

Travelling with young children is one of the most stressful undertakings as a parent. Some times you don’t think rationally.

The reality is that if the Cabin Manger just simply facilitated a seat change then none of this would have happened period.


This is not the cabin crews fault. It’s the absolute lack of customer service training that takes place. Train your crews to follow the rules and procedures while taking a compassionate approach! But as we have seen time and time again there is no culpability in the QF group.

davidclarke is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by davidclarke:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 02:08
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,285
Received 350 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by MagnumPI

Many pilots may not be particularly charismatic (and perhaps that suits their occupation just fine most of the time) - but you should still be able to hold a discussion with a passenger.

Nothing reported on yet about whether or not the CA or FO tried to speak with the passenger before the authorities arrived with a freshly charged taser. I hope one of them tried.
Looking at it from another perspective. Passengers need to follow cabin crew instructions. If they aren't going to do it on the ground then they probably won't do it inflight, therefore they should be removed from the flight before it gets airborne and the problem becomes a lot harder to solve. A pilot can't keep going back into the cabin during the flight to tell an unruly passenger to behave, if they won't listen to CC on the ground then that's reason enough to remove them.
dr dre is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by dr dre:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 02:11
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,285
Received 350 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by davidclarke
The reality is that if the Cabin Manger just simply facilitated a seat change then none of this would have happened period.
Or if the guy just sat where he was supposed to then none of this would've happened. Period.
dr dre is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by dr dre:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 02:17
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Aus
Posts: 172
Received 39 Likes on 23 Posts
You're assuming people are rational actors dr dre, but they're often not. There's always going to be disputes. Of course passengers should follow instructions, but when they don't the crew should have the skills to de-escalate.

As davidclarke posted just above you, there's a common thread in just about all of the publicity concerning QF Group lately - lack of customer service skills, which comes from lack of training, and perhaps a genuine lack of empathy from someone's personality - in which case they should never be hired.

It's a good thing that many posters here in the thread aren't hostage negotiators. The hostages would be killed every time!
MagnumPI is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 02:20
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre
Or if the guy just sat where he was supposed to then none of this would've happened. Period.
I just trying to show that the situation could have been diffused quickly quietly and none of this would needed to have taken place. Period.
davidclarke is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 02:35
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 4 seasons hotel
Posts: 268
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

For sure nobody would want this.
flightleader is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 03:10
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,091
Received 471 Likes on 126 Posts
We really have no idea exactly what unfolded.
It appears to me that the CC was fairly calm and quiet when she relayed to the pax that they now have reason to offload him. Was she told to relay that after chatting with the Captain? Who knows? Had the gate manager already informed the crew that the pax had been difficult in the terminal? Who knows? Was the person he had swapped with in an emergency exit but unsuitable to be there? Who knows?
Whatever the situation leading up to the AFP taking over, the method used to get him off is an AFP issue, not Jetstars.
Cabin Crew don’t get paid enough or trained enough to make nuanced decisions around W&B, they are just told that it is of critical importance. At the end of the day he chose to dig his heels in and we’ve all seen the result.
framer is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by framer:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 04:01
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by MagnumPI
You're probably right.

My theory is that people are far less comfortable having difficult conversations and resolving disputes. Anecdotally, I see this all the time in business with people trying to negotiate or resolve disputes over text or email instead of picking up the phone or meeting face to face. Pre-internet you use to complain about a business by writing or calling to speak with someone who (hopefully) cared. These days most people just let loose on a keyboard, and will say things that they'd never otherwise say to a human being!

Many pilots may not be particularly charismatic (and perhaps that suits their occupation just fine most of the time) - but you should still be able to hold a discussion with a passenger.

Nothing reported on yet about whether or not the CA or FO tried to speak with the passenger before the authorities arrived with a freshly charged taser. I hope one of them tried.
Everyone has different ways in approaching passengers communication. I don’t speak to passengers (unless medical), generally it goes nowhere. Either they follow my crews instruction, or they are off. It’s that simple. I get the crew to give them the go or no go question, generally they won’t answer, so they are off. I then close the cockpit door and the AFP can do whatever they wish.

You can see how it can go south if crew get too involved, that Virgin event with the pilot in a punch on with the passenger near the cockpit door wasn’t great. I’ve seen a few videos in the US with Pilots getting on the wrong side of being involved.

PoppaJo is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by PoppaJo:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 04:32
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 78
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
When Michael O'Leary's protégé, one Alan Joyce, took over Qantas he set up Jetstar in the Ryanair mould, complete "no sitting together unless you pay".

That policy caused this and Jetstar's check in contractors and cabin attendants exacerbated it by following the LCC's "customer service doesn't apply here" attitude.

So, indirectly, and drawing a long bow, the buck stops at the Irishman's desk. Of course AFP didn't help either
Chris2303 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Chris2303:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 04:44
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,430
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris2303
When Michael O'Leary's protégé, one Alan Joyce, took over Qantas he set up Jetstar in the Ryanair mould, complete "no sitting together unless you pay".

That policy caused this and Jetstar's check in contractors and cabin attendants exacerbated it by following the LCC's "customer service doesn't apply here" attitude.

So, indirectly, and drawing a long bow, the buck stops at the Irishman's desk. Of course AFP didn't help either

No, the passenger not following the Cabin Crews instructions caused this.
Ollie Onion is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Ollie Onion:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 05:08
  #59 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,966
Received 92 Likes on 53 Posts
No, the passenger not following the Cabin Crews instructions caused this.
And of that, I am certain, is how any Court of Law will view it.
Pinky the pilot is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Mar 2023, 05:11
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
I suggest listen to the longer YouTube version, the AFP officers state the reasons to the passenger in why he is being removed, and the consequences if he does not comply.
PoppaJo is offline  
The following users liked this post:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.